Do you think that content quality on this sub is impacted mostly by crypto kids who want to become billionaires in a day? Turns out there is more to that.

It is not easy to enter crypto, even using the wallet can be confusing. That's why I made a beginner friendly crypto interface which shows only fundamental features. I showed it to my non crypto friend and they confirmed that they could use it with ease. I wanted more feedback so I asked this sub about it. It got received well and I got almost instantaneous valuable comments.

However shortly after it got deleted and oh irony! the reason for that was "low effort" content. While hundreds of allowed topics of the next memecoin are obviously not. Turns out writing bunch of code is considered "low effort" by at least somebody. My question is: How crypto community can move further while even they hinder technological advancement (in this case it was a tool that can bring more folks into crypto) and instead promotes discussion about useless topics? To be fair. I wrote to two different shared accounts (so it's not like somebody is offline especially if they can delete a topic quickly), waited half a day and got no response. Most likely this topic would be also removed and told to be written in the other sub, which almost nobody reads. So there is no visibility about somebody complaining about this. It got me thinking. How many other, actually valuable topics got removed before. What is your take on that?

Edit: I don't have any incentive from what I made, as the code is open so it was not a shill, I didn't even give the link, only a screenshot of the design because that's the feedback I needed so it also can not be a scam. To answer some of the comments.